Your Search Results

Islamic suicide bombers: Perspective

Comments Off

By K.N. Pandit

A new dimension of contemporary Islamic terror surfaced in its full force with 9/11 event.  In Palestine, suicide bombers have been in action for a long time but observers did not bring them under special focus.  For a long time, it seemed unbelievable that somebody would blow himself up for blowing up a large number of innocent people while standing amidst them.

Indians met with the first shock of a suicide bomber in operation when Rajiv Gandhi was blown up by a woman who had tied a bomb to her body. LTTE frequently used suicide bombing as a war weapon against Sri Lankan security forces.

With terror unleashed by Islamic Theo-fascists, suicide bombing has become a regular feature of destroying innocent lives in various parts of the world especially in such regions as are alleged to be in a state of conflict and crisis (daru’l harb).  Other purpose of the perpetrators of terror is to destabilize governments and paralyze civil institutions as the process of replacing all existing faiths and their institutions by Islamic faith and sharia.

Suicide bombers have been active in some of the eastern states of India where insurgency has taken roots for quite some time.  During the Khalistan movement in Punjab, there were many cases of suicide bombing which caused considerable loss of life and property and created nightmare for the security forces.

But it is Kashmir where suicide bombers have a wide network. History of suicide bombing in Kashmir during past two decades of insurgency has shown that the pattern of these acts of subversion is almost identical. This suggests that the suicide bombers receive training from the same source.

In Kashmir Theo-fascists embarking on suicide bombing generally targeted the camps of the security forces and police establishments. Their methods vary according to the nature of the target. For example while targeting a camp of security forces or police establishment, the suicide bombers drive a car or a  jeep loaded with RDX and the suicide  bomber ties  bombs to  his body and then gate crashes into the target. This blows up the gate or the protection wall and the personnel manning the post are also blown up.

These tactics change in the case of blowing up an individual or a couple of individuals. The killer ties a bomb to his body and when he is juxtaposed to the target, presses the button and the bomb blows up killing him and the target(s).

Obviously a suicide bomber is fully brainwashed for quite some time till he is mentally prepared to kill and get killed.  His brainwashing is done by sensitizing him to Islamic religious teachings of making all kinds of sacrifices to spread and propagate Islam —- brute force and violence being its important instruments. In the first phase of brainwashing, the object is made to believe through incessant propaganda sprees that Islam, the last of the faiths sent down on earth by Allah through his Prophet, has to prevail and that all Muslims are enjoined to make any sacrifice in that direction. It is called divine ordination, and has to be obeyed come what may.

In order to sharpen his religious zeal, he is told that Islam is in danger at such and such a place or region and the Muslims have to be liberated. The philosophy of martyrdom in Islam is of great significance and martyrdom (shahadat) means laying down life not for the country or the nation or the motherland but for Islam. Ali and his son Husayn laid down life for the faith and hence they are the foremost of martyrs in Islamic history.

Martyrdom (shahadat) as an adjunct of faith is actually the contribution of the Shia’ sect and gradually extended to the Sunni sect as well. The first ever attempt of inducting it into politics was made by the Assassins of Iran around the time of the rise of Chingiz Khan in Central Asia in 13th century. The name of Hasan bin Sabbah is linked to the episode of Grand Master of Alamut, a mountain stronghold in western Iran. Hasan bin Sabbah is reported to have raised a strong band of his followers indoctrinated with the philosophy of suicidal attacks on their political adversaries or the adversaries of Ismaili faith.

In the stronghold of Alamut Mountain, Hasan bin Sabbah had laid beautiful parks with streams of pure water flowing through and some luxurious complexes where beautiful damsels were housed. When a follower of his faith called dai’ finished his training in terrorism and indoctrination, he would be brought to the gate of the Alamut fort, administered a drug called hashish in Farsi (Assassin is drawn from hashish) and after getting intoxicated, he would be bodily lifted and put in a beautiful room within the fort where, on regaining his senses, he would find beautiful damsels entertaining him. Thus he would believe that Sabbah was the intermediary to take him to paradise with promised fresh cool water and honey and damsels.

Once out of the fort, he reinforced his allegiance to Hasan bin Sabbah and became a devout dai, the present-day fidayeen, The fidayeen of Hasan bin Sabbah compassed many murders of opponents of Ismaili faith including the Prime Minister Nidhamu’l Mulk Tusi who was warned the previous night by striking a dagger in the ground outside his tent to which a letter was attached saying he would be killed. It was only Chingiz Khan, the great Mongol warrior who attacked and destroyed the Alamut fortress and dispersed the fidayeen. However the idea of martyrdom in the path of faith stuck and has now re-emerged in its new avatar.

In the backdrop of this scenario, the suicide bombers have to be understood in historical perspective. Then it was Hasan bin Sabbah and his small group of fidayeen but now it is entire Muslim ummah in all the five continents of the globe that is fascinated about martyrdom in the path of religion of Muhammad.

(The writer is the former Director of the Centre of Central Asian Studies, Kashmir University).

Ethnic Cleansing of Kashmir Valley

Comments Off

By K.N. Pandit

The Hindu religious minority of Kashmir Valley, known as Pandits formed nearly 07 per cent of the total population of Kashmir province at the time of the accession of Jammu and Kashmir State to the Indian Union in October 1947. Owing to discriminatory policies of successive regimes in J and K ever since, a good percentage of the Pandits was forced to leave their homeland and seek livelihood in other parts of the country. As a result of eruption of armed insurgency in late 1989-90,  Theo-fascists made the Pandits their selective targets killing more than a thousand innocent members within a couple of months of insurgency. Their objective was to enforce ethnic cleansing of Kashmiri Pandits from the Valley in order to pave the way for Islamic homogenization with sharia replacing secular democratic dispensation. Radical and Wahhabi Islamic ideologues in Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, who have sponsored the jihadi terror world over, consider Kashmir integral to the concept of Islamic Caliphate. The Pandits were considered a symbol of secularist presence in Kashmir.  Religious extremists decided to efface this symbol once for all because it obstructed their scheme of things.

Continue Reading…

Contemporary Kashmir Politics - Some Insights

Comments Off

Asian-Eurasian Human Rights forum
Cordially, invites you to the launch of the book

Contemporary Kashmir Politics: Some Insights

By Reshi Dev and Kashinath Pandit (see flyer)

The book will be released by Shri Jagmohan, Former Governor J and K and Union Minister
Guest of Honour: Shri Arun Shouri,  former Union Minister

On Thursday, 6th Nov. 2008 at 5.30 P.M. at the  Indian International Centre (Committee Room II)
40, Max Muller Marg, New Delhi-110003.

TEA:  5 p.m.
Tele (0) 981 821 77 55

Contemporary Kashmir politics - Some insights

Comments Off

Update your knowledge of Kashmir history

New Arrival

Contemporary Kashmir politics

Some insights

(based on the political diary of Reshi Dev)

Translation and annotation by K.N. Pandit

Published by Asian-Eurasian Human Rights Forum

E-241, Sarita Vihar, New Delhi – 110076

Hard bound, pages 238, price Rs. 400.00

.

Reshi Dev, a life–long political activist of Kashmir, hopped in and out of almost all major political parties, worked honestly at grassroots level for seven decades, came into contact with many leading personalities in politics and, to his great consternation, found that they were sincere only to their self-interests and not to the people who returned them to power in elections. Bruised and mauled, Reshi Dev penned down at the age of 92 his reminiscences in exile.  K.N. Pandit has translated this diary from Urdu into English adding informative annotations and appendices.

Nuclear deal and Asian conflicts

Comments Off

By K.N. Pandit

Indo-US civilian nuclear deal promises further cementing of good relations between two major democracies of the world. At the same time it is a boost to democracy in principle as the time tested political dispensation that ensures equitable justice and protection of human rights.

The deal is expected to meet India’s energy requirement, contribute to economic development and raise the quality of life of millions of Indians. That is how ordinary people will interpret the claim of ending India’s nuclear segregation.

Any deal of this importance and depth should not be taken into account either in isolation or in narrow national perspective. India is not a small country that will exert minimum impact on neighbouring countries and the region. What will be the implication on the region which, as we all know, is not only very sensitive but also involved in chronic conflicts and contradictions?

Continue Reading…

J and K heading for assembly election

Comments Off

By K.N. Pandit

After nearly two months of half-hearted affirmative and negative posturing, political parties in Jammu and Kashmir are gearing up for 7-stage elections to the state assembly beginning with first tie on November 17 in Ladakh region.

Two mainstream political parties, Congress and National Conference have kick-started election campaigning, while PDP, the accidental political pigmy, is still busy debating the option whether it should or should not participate. Its hesitation comes from commitment made to separatists of securing pre-requisites before going to polls.

In more than one way, the forthcoming election will be unique in the history of post-accession election process in the state.  Separatists have vowed to enforce poll boycott, which is their patent policy ever since the rise of armed insurgency in Kashmir.

Continue Reading…

Internally displaced Persons from Kashmir

Comments Off

By K.N. Pandit

The Hindu religious minority of Kashmir Valley, known as Pandits formed nearly 07 per cent of the total population of Kashmir province at the time of the accession of Jammu and Kashmir State to the Indian Union in October 1947. Owing to discriminatory policies of successive regimes in J&K ever since, a good percentage of the Pandits was forced to leave their homeland and seek livelihood in other parts of the country. As a result of eruption of armed insurgency in late 1989-90,  Theo-fascists made the Pandits their selective targets killing more than a thousand innocent members within a couple of months of insurgency. Their objective was to enforce ethnic cleansing of Kashmiri Pandits from the Valley in order to pave the way for Islamic homogenization with sharia replacing secular democratic dispensation. Radical and Wahhabi Islamic ideologues in Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, who have sponsored the jihadi terror world over, consider Kashmir integral to the concept of Islamic Caliphate. The Pandits were considered a symbol of secularist presence in Kashmir.  Religious extremists decided to efface this symbol once for all because it obstructed their scheme of things.

Continue Reading…

The mess about J&K elections

Comments Off

By K.N. Pandit

While elections for the state assemblies in five states will be held according to the schedule of the Election Commission of India, J&K has been left out of the process. Normally elections in this state should have been announced around 10th of September and the polling would have taken place sometime in November 2008.

By not announcing whether elections in J&K will or will not be held on time, the Election Commission has created a situation of suspense and uncertainty. Deferring elections for a specific period of time for the state assemblies or for parliament is nothing new or extraordinary. Deferment of elections owing to some specific reasons and for specific time is generally happens on the advice of the government. Nevertheless, the Election Commission has the discretion allowed to it by the Constitution to decide about the dates.

Continue Reading…

Does India need revised frontier policy?

Comments Off

By K.N. Pandit

The fact of the matter is that during the national struggle for freedom led by Congress, our leaders did not give any serious thought to India’s frontier policy once power passed into their hands. Perhaps they were pre-occupied with a host of baffling internal problems and with the framing of the constitutional structure for the independent country.

Within weeks of freedom, the first signals of vulnerability of India’s north-western frontier were in sight. Pakistan-sponsored incursion of Kashmir by NWFP tribesmen in October 1947 should have prompted Indian policy planners to think beyond Kashmir and beyond the tribal invasion.  Alas, they did not.

If there had been a serious thinking on new situation arising on our north-western frontier after the departure of the British, we would not have gone to beg peace at the doors of the United Nations. It was a clear sign of our weakness and lack of vision about our frontier policy. Our adversaries exploited this weakness to the hilt.

Continue Reading…

J&K Assembly Elections

Comments Off

By K.N. Pandit

Behind this argument lies the fallacy that elections mean legitimizing Indian presence in the state.

Election Commission is about to declare the dates of election in Jammu and Kashmir despite the separatists, PDP and NC demanding deferment.

In the beginning Congress showed signs of vacillation but now it appears to have recovered its confidence.

Those demanding deferment till political climate of the state becomes conducive argue that memories of recent upheaval in the valley are still fresh in the minds of the people. Behind this argument lies the fallacy that elections mean legitimizing Indian presence in the state.

Separatist groups including both factions of Hurriyat and their collaborators are averse to a democratic dispensation under Indian Constitutional provisions. Hence, their denouncing of November elections under one pretext or the other is not unexpected.

But two mainstream political parties, PDP and NC, are ostensibly on the horns of dilemma. This situation is one which they created for themselves.

Continue Reading…