Your Search Results

Farooq Abdulla: from frustration to anger to hatred

Comments Off

Upgraded version on Jan 9 / 21 h 46, Western European Time
By K N Pandita

Power, popularity and riches came heaping on FarooEUq Abdullah as the body of his late father was laid to eternal rest close to the Hazratbal shrine in Srinagar. Father’s massive socio-political legacy and abounding support from Indira Gandhi, the then Prime Minister of India, were strong factors to shut the mouth of critics and political opponents of Farooq when he stepped into the shoes of his late father with hardly the criterion set forth for an Indian politician.

Along with other traits of character, Farooq has inherited eccentricity as well, which remained with him all his life. He could be whimsical, capricious, and fanciful. But very few people know that he has a method in madness. The Farsi proverb ‘ diwana ba kaar-i khud hoshyar – very eloquently explains his psyche. In simple translation, it could be ‘ a distraught man but watchful of his selfish-interests’.

He became the Chief Minister of J&K thrice with the outright support of Congress. He has a history of being on and off the Congress bandwagon. He could endear himself to Atal Bihari Vajpayee who picked him up as his cabinet member to soft-paddle with his Muslim constituency. At one time, he had great expectations that the Congress would nominate him as its candidate as Vice President of India. That did not happen but the BJP inducted his son into the Council of Ministers.

In this way, Congress raised the profile of the house of the Sheikh to heights that people in Kashmir said the Dogra ruling dynasty was replaced by the Sheikdom of Kashmir. These favours and privileges were strong enough to turn the head of Farooq, who has now given up his weirdness and eccentricity and is talking with a sense of deprivation and despondency.

His observations on the situation in Kashmir today as reported by the local print media evokes pity for the man who clings to political manoeuvring and power aspiration at the advanced age of 85. What is more, he says he has lost faith in India, her secularism, democratic dispensation, humanism and all that he has been praising and standing by during his long years in power. Most of his observations are focused on asserting that you are all the bad and I am all the good. The party holding power at the Centre has come to power through due process of the constitution. When Farooq calls it a “communal and divisive force”, he is challenging the will of the majority of Indian voters. He betrays faithlessness in democracy. In such a situation how is he going to define his electoral victories in the elections in J&K especially that of 1986 which gave birth to MUF and its aftermath?

What justification has Farooq to call BJP a communal government when in his government thousands of acres of forest and state land were grabbed under a controversial law called the Roshni Act and distributed among blued-eyed Kashmiris on throw-away price? What justification has he to call BJP a communal government and his a secular government when thousands of kanals of forest land was grabbed by his party stalwarts and mandarins clandestinely in Bhatindi and sold with the notification “only Muslims are allowed to apply for allotment”. The result is that Bhatindi is a mini-Pakistan where Farooq holds a patch of 25 kanals (nearly 3 acres) of this general loot. Again in the case of the Siddhra Colony, the Housing Department categorically stated that Kashmiri Muslims would be given preferential treatment. Farooq and Kashmir leadership embraced communalism and carried the coffin of democracy on their shoulders the day when thousands of Rohingya were officially re-settled in Jammu along the IB and were provided with facilities like ration cards, aadhaar cards, identity cards, water and power supply etc. all contrary to the then provisions of Article 370 of the Constitution. Farooq cannot accuse BJP of communalism when the PDP government withdrew the Jammu police investigating staff from investigating a criminal case in Kathua and brought the Muslim police staff from Kashmir to conduct the investigation. When Farooq’s goons misbehaved and manhandled the ED staff, including a lady officer, that had arrived from New Delhi to investigate the tax evasion by some big business magnates in Srinagar, his government had sown the seeds for the abrogation of the special status of J&K. Farooq has no ground for making any complaint.

Farooq laments that the “Kashmiri youth feel they have no place in modern India and have lost faith in the government in Delhi. I think the tragedy is that every Muslim, whether he belongs to Kashmir or the rest of India, has to continuously prove that he is a nationalist, that he is an Indian. Why? Why can’t it be done for the others? Why can’t they ask the Hindus, ‘Are you Indians?”

Farooq should not have said misleading words like these. Instead, he should have made a moment’s introspection and asked his self why did thousands of Kashmiri youth choose to cross the border clandestinely, go to PoK, get themselves enrolled in terrorist camps established by the Pakistan army, receive training and arms and indoctrination and return to the valley at the risk of their lives and raise the banner of armed insurgency. Farooq should have introspected how his party cadres, colleagues and selected bureaucracy covertly and overtly supported armed insurgency and subverted national interests. Farooq should have introspected how he and his party seniors meticulously avoided criticizing the gun-wielding Kashmiris rising in an insurgency, massacring the Pandit community, looting their vacated homes and grabbing their properties. He should have ruminated how he subtly encouraged alienation of the vast masses of Kashmiri people by telling them that the Pandits left homes and hearths on the call of Governor Jagmohan. A leader of his stature should have been true to his conscience and spoken the truth not falsehood. Had he not ordered the release of about 50 Kashmiri boys who had returned after training in terrorism and were facing prosecution? They included murderers like Bita Karate who said in a televised interview that after killing 22 Kashmiri Pandits, he had lost the count. Was not Farooq hand in glove with them?

He should ruminate how Kashmiri Muslims willingly offered the warmest hospitality to the terrorists from across the ceasefire line calling them “guest mujahid” and providing them with all comforts and guidance they needed. Did Farooq or any one party of the Gupkar Alliance obstruct these activities? Did they ever give a call to the people to refuse hospitality to the terrorists? Did he ever give a call for a mass protest against Pakistan sending armed gangsters to unleash mayhem in Kashmir? Did Farooq ever realize the consequences of government reacting to the armed insurgency and the segments of society that would be affected by the action of the security forces?

If Farooq felt no need at any point of time of taking even one of these steps, why does he now lament that Kashmiri youth feel they have no place in India. It is not the Kashmiri youth alone, it is the Kashmiri of any age who will not find a place for himself in India as long as he carries the Pakistan-provided gun on his shoulders. This applies to the Gupkar Alliance members also.

Farooq has raised another question. Let us quote him precisely. He says, “Today, every Muslim, whether he belongs to Kashmir or the rest of India, has to “continuously prove” that he is a nationalist despite his community having shed blood for the country”. Who else but Farooq knows the precise answer to that question? But since providing the answer publicly does not suit his political interests, he will not touch on it. The entire history of terrorism in Kashmir shows that only the Muslims have been the insurgents, accomplices, over or underground conduits, carriers of secret messages and weapons and all that armed insurgency needs. Those providing safe heavens to the terrorists, guiding them across the forests and uncommon routes, providing them intelligence about the police force’s movements or the movement of the security forces, plotting subversion, coming out in thousands as stone-pelting youth and slogan mongering etc. all have been Muslims. Those who have been apprehended by the police while trying to cross the border clandestinely have been Muslims. What has Farooq to say about that?

Farooq has rejected the report of the delimitation commission. There are other groups also who have rejected it for various reasons. We have nothing to say about that. But Farooq has raised the question of why the Kashmiri Pandit and Kashmir Sikh demand reservation of seats has not been included in the report. The pot calling the kettle black. Did Farooq during his three stints in office as chief minister ever speak a word about the rights of or reservation for the religious minority of Pandits and Sikhs? Never. Not only that. Twice did the Chairman of the Minorities Commission of India write to him (when he was a chief minister) to recommend to the Home Ministry that the Kashmiri Pandits and Sikhs should be categorized as minorities in the J&K. Farooq never responded. When late Mufti Saeed and PM Modi announced after a joint meeting in Delhi the question of the return of the Pandits under the clauses of the Memorandum of Alliance, a total and unprecedented strike was observed in Srinagar for one full day against the announcement. Not only that, in the legislative assembly, NC and PDP members jointly clashed with BJP members and came to blows when the former threatened that never will a single Pandit be allowed to return. A general secretary of the National Conference is on record to have said that “if Pandits are allowed to return, each Pandit will bring with him three Israelis”.

We learn that these days some NC activists are approaching the Kashmiri migrants in Jammu directly or indirectly to mollify them into joining hands with NC in the contemplated elections to the assembly. No Kashmiri Pandit worth his salt is going to join hands with those who are accomplices in their genocide and ethnic cleansing.

Farooq says that Muslims have given blood for India and today nationalism of the Muslims is questioned. How many Muslims of Kashmir sacrificed their lives during the thirty years of the NC-led movement against the Dogra autocratic rule? How many of his party workers were killed? Let Farooq compare the numbers with the number of Muslims gunned down by the guest mujahids in Kashmir on charges of being spies (mukhbir). The numbers will speak out the truth.

In the final analysis, what ails Farooq and what makes him lament for the Muslim community of India and not only Kashmir is something else. The dirge is not only of Farooq but of all those who refuse to read the writing on the wall, those who want to turn the face away from the realities of history. Farooq laments the loss of Sheikhdom forgetting that if the Duggar Raj could not last beyond the fourth generation, how can the Sheikhdom last beyond the third generation.

The reality is that the Islamic Theo-fascism, which sustained the separatist movement in Kashmir and behind which Farooq & Co walked with full expectations, has received a fatal blow from the fountain-head of Islamic authority in Riyadh. Prince Salman has come out as the prophet of deep and drastic reformation of Islam and the ummah. After banning the Tablighi Jama’at, the group that was generously promoted by the regime of Sheikh Abdullah in 1980-81, the violence-loving and terror-adoring Islamic states, organizations and individuals find their spinal cord broken and wrecked. The political Islam that was employed to befool the unsuspecting Muslim masses only for self-aggrandizement has no option but to wind up its shop. Islam is entering a new phase of inclusiveness, openness and universal brotherhood. It wants to deal with its adversaries also based on equality and justice. Prince Salman is trying to replace “Islamo-phobia” with “Islamo-rationale”. Farooq is a modern man and has seen life in its various forms. He must welcome the rising and outreaching Islam and disassociate himself with the political Islam of the ignorant mullahs. Alas! He has thrown the Gupkar albatross around his neck and is now crying at the world in frustration.

Real Estate Summit agenda for J&K

Comments Off

By K N Pandita

After bringing in the J&K Reorganization Act 2019, the opposition blamed the government for being too hasty and not offering anything substantial to J&K under the changed dispensation. This was also the refrain of the dissident valley leadership. Continue Reading…

A phony state called “Azad Jammu and Kashmir“

Comments Off

By K N Pandita

J&K’s accession to the Indian Union on 26 October 1947 was the direct result of the incursion of Kashmir by the lashkars of North West Frontier tribesmen conceived, planned and abetted by the rulers of the nascent State of Pakistan. The diehard activists of Lord Curzon’s “Great Game in Central Asia” of mid-19th century, working in tandem with the new brand Islamists in the sub-continent, focused attention on one particular objective of stonewalling India’s access to the west and north. Continue Reading…

UN Human Rights Commission misled on Kashmir event

Comments Off

By K N Pandita

On December 1, Al Jazeera published a longish write-up of one Rifat Fareed on the arrest of Khurram Pervez, the so-called Kashmiri Human Rights activist by the NIA for his involvement in terrorist related funding and links. Continue Reading…

Delimitation Commission’s Report: partial justice

Comments Off

By K N Pandita

In the course of its deliberations, the Delimitation Commission met with leaders from the Peoples Conference, National Conference (NC), CPI, CPI (M), Panthers Party, Congress, BJP, Apni Party and Bahujan Samaj Party. The Commission also met with District Election officers from Anantnag, Kulgam, Pulwama and Shopian. The Commission also met with various delegations of the people of the Union territory from both regions to know their views on issues connected with the delimitation of constituencies. Continue Reading…

India adopts a visionary and statesmanlike Afghan policy

Comments Off

By K N Pandita

India’s cordial relations with the people of Afghanistan is traceable in the Vedic times and the hoary past when, according to the antiquarians, the Aryans had left vast Central Asian dried up grasslands and got dispersed in different parts of the old world including Northern India for permanent resettlement. Continue Reading…

Investigate sabotage angle in Gen Rawat’s chopper crash

Comments Off

By Prof. K.N. Pandita

see picture one on news intervention.com

“The nation has lost one of its bravest sons. His four decades of selfless service to the motherland were marked by exceptional gallantry and heroism. My condolences to his family,” grieved the President of India on the tragic death of India’s 1st Chief of the Defence Staff, General Bipin Rawat and his wife Madhulika Rawat in a chopper crash at Coonoor in Tamilnadu on December 8, 2021. Continue Reading…

The nation has lost its bravest son

Comments Off

By K N Pandita

“The nation has lost one of its bravest sons. His four decades of selfless service to the motherland were marked by exceptional gallantry and heroism. My condolence to his family”, grieved the President of India on the tragic death of India’s 1st Chief of the Defence Staff, General Bipin Rawat and his wife Madhulika Rawat in a chopper crash in Coonoor in Tamilnadu on Wednesday. Continue Reading…

Farooq Abdullah exhort Kashmiris to make sacrifices

Comments Off

By K N Pandita

People who know Farooq Abdullah well call him an eccentric man. Even some of his senior party colleagues also profile him like that. The fact is that he has a method of madness. He never advocated Kashmir’s accession to Pakistan because he had learnt the lesson from his father who had personal experience of dealing with Pakistanis. Moreover, Farooq has had a long interaction with the Pakistanis and particularly with the PoK Diaspora in the UK. Continue Reading…

UN Human Rights Commission misled on Kashmir event

Comments Off

By K N Pandita

On December 1, Al Jazeera published a longish write-up of one Rifat Fareed on the arrest of Khurram Pervez, the so-called Kashmiri Human Rights activist by the NIA for his involvement in terrorism-related funding and links. Continue Reading…